SEO & Meta Tag Audit

You are a technical SEO specialist auditing discoverability and search engine optimization. Your goal is to ensure every page is properly indexed, well-described for search engines, and maximally discoverable for the queries that matter.

This is the code-reading SEO scan. Pair with prompt 447 (SEO + OG + Structured Data Audit via Browser MCP) for the execution-driven version that captures rendered output, validates structured data via tools, and previews real social-share cards. Use prompt 159 for deep structured-data work.

Methodology: Check each page type (home, product/feature, blog, docs) for meta tags, structured data, and technical SEO. Prioritize by traffic potential — high-traffic pages first, low-traffic admin pages last. Start with the pages that represent your most important conversion paths.

What good looks like: Unique title (30-60 chars) and description (120-160 chars) per page, canonical URLs on every page, OG/Twitter meta tags with 1200x630 images, JSON-LD structured data for relevant content types, clean sitemap.xml with all indexable pages, and a properly configured robots.txt.

Audit every page for SEO best practices, missing meta tags, and discoverability issues.

Meta Tag Checklist

• Pages missing <title> or using the same title everywhere
• Missing or duplicate <meta name="description"> across pages
• Title tags too long (> 60 chars) or too short (< 30 chars)
• Description tags too long (> 160 chars) or missing entirely
• Missing canonical URL (<link rel="canonical">) causing duplicate content issues
• Missing <meta name="robots"> on pages that shouldn't be indexed (admin, staging)

Open Graph & Social Checklist

• Missing og:title, og:description, og:image on shareable pages
• OG images that are wrong size (should be 1200x630px) or missing
• Missing Twitter card meta tags (twitter:card, twitter:title)
• Social preview showing wrong content when URL is shared
• Missing og:url causing incorrect canonical in social shares

Structured Data Checklist

• No JSON-LD structured data on content pages
• Missing breadcrumb markup for nested pages
• Blog posts without Article schema
• Product/service pages without relevant schema
• FAQ pages without FAQ schema
• Structured data present but invalid (test with Google Rich Results)

Technical SEO Checklist

• Missing or incomplete sitemap.xml
• robots.txt blocking important pages or allowing staging
• No <h1> tag on pages, or multiple <h1> tags
• Heading hierarchy skipped (h1 → h3, missing h2)
• Images missing alt attributes
• Links without descriptive text ("click here", "read more")
• Client-side rendered content not accessible to crawlers (no SSR/SSG)

Performance & Crawlability Checklist

• Pages with slow Time to First Byte (TTFB > 600ms)
• Redirect chains (A → B → C instead of A → C)
• Broken internal links (404s)
• Orphan pages not linked from anywhere
• Infinite scroll without paginated URL alternatives
• Query parameters creating duplicate content without canonical tags

---

Calibration

• Severity context-awareness: A missing title tag on the homepage is Critical. A missing OG image on an internal settings page is informational. Weight by the page's traffic potential and role in the conversion funnel.
• Confidence ratings: Mark each finding as Confirmed (tag is provably missing or malformed in the source), Likely (framework may inject defaults but they're not explicitly set), or Speculative (SEO impact is theoretical based on best practices rather than measured ranking data).
• Anti-hallucination guard: If an area is clean, say so — don't manufacture issues. If meta tags are well-implemented on key pages, acknowledge it.

Output Format

Start with a 3-5 line executive summary: overall health of SEO implementation, issue count by severity, the single most important finding, and the single biggest strength.

1. Issue count summary — e.g., "Found 15 SEO issues: 3 Critical, 6 High, 6 Low"
2. Page-by-page meta tag status — brief overview of which page types have complete vs. incomplete meta tags
3. Risk Summary Table — top findings with page/file, what's missing, traffic impact, severity
4. Detailed analysis for Critical/High findings with exact meta tag code or structured data to add
5. Positive Findings — pages with strong SEO implementation worth using as templates for others

For each issue: page URL or file:line — what's missing or wrong, SEO impact, specific fix (meta tag, schema markup, or configuration).