Skip to main content

Custom software services

Software for the bottleneck that matters

I help teams diagnose workflow friction, ship focused first releases, and support live systems with clarity. The work is custom when it needs to be, and deliberately small when it should be.

The goal is useful change without a large platform or process.

Engagement modes

Three ways to work together

Workflow or product diagnostic

Fit: Best when a team sees the same friction repeatedly and needs help deciding what to change.

Deliverables

  • A plain-language read on the workflow, failure points, and constraints
  • A recommendation on what should be built, fixed, integrated, or left alone
  • A focused path into a first release when custom software makes sense

Process

  1. 01Review the current workflow, tools, handoffs, and operator pain
  2. 02Clarify the decision that matters most right now
  3. 03Turn the findings into a practical next-step recommendation

See the audit tools behind this work

Scoped first release

Fit: Best when the problem is understood well enough to define and build a focused first version.

Deliverables

  • A concrete first release aligned to the workflow that actually needs to change
  • Visible progress in working software, with enough documentation to support it
  • Launch-ready implementation with the next risks and follow-on scope made explicit

Process

  1. 01Reduce the opportunity to the smallest release that creates useful change
  2. 02Build in the open so feedback lands before assumptions harden
  3. 03Launch with a clear handoff and a practical map for what comes next

View a shipped release

Ongoing product or operational support

Fit: Best when a system already exists and needs steady improvement, sharper operations, or a trusted technical partner who can keep shipping.

Deliverables

  • Prioritized fixes, workflow improvements, and feature follow-through
  • Operational support for content, analytics, integrations, and internal tooling
  • A running view of what is changing, why it matters, and what should wait

Process

  1. 01Start from the current product, backlog, or operational pressure points
  2. 02Tighten the highest-value bottlenecks first
  3. 03Keep the work legible so support never turns into vague retainer drift

Read the notes

More detail

See how the work comes together

Projects, prompts, and notes provide a closer look at how I make product and delivery decisions.

Case studies

Shipped systems, the workflows they replaced, and the operational problems they now carry.

Explore projects

Prompt library

Reusable prompts for reviewing products, code, security, delivery, and operations.

Browse prompts

Notes

Writing about product decisions, technical tradeoffs, and delivery lessons.

Read posts

How the work moves

A visible process beats vague progress

  1. 01

    Start with the current workflow

    Who does the work, what tools exist today, and where the handoff breaks down come before solutioning.

  2. 02

    Shrink the problem to a useful move

    The goal is a decision the team can act on and a scope that is small enough to move.

  3. 03

    Ship with visibility

    The work stays legible as it moves: what changed, what is next, and what should not be built yet.

Before you reach out

Frequently asked questions

What kind of work is a strong fit?

A good fit is a recurring workflow, product, or operational bottleneck that affects the people using it. Sometimes the right recommendation is to keep or better configure an existing tool.

Do I need a full specification before reaching out?

No. A useful starting point is the workflow, the people involved, and what keeps breaking. Discovery exists to clarify the rest.

Can you work with the tools we already use?

Usually. Part of the job is deciding whether to integrate with the current stack, replace a brittle piece, or leave a tool alone and work around it.

What happens after a release ships?

That depends on the engagement. Some teams want a clean handoff. Others need ongoing operational or product support. The path should be explicit before that decision matters.

Start with the bottleneck, not the perfect brief

If a workflow, product handoff, or operational gap keeps costing attention, send the current situation. If I am not the right fit, I will tell you directly.